| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the GDS component in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x and 11.x before 11.0-FP5 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.x through 11.x before 11.3-IF2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Identity Manager (ITIM) 5.0 before 5.0.0.15 and 5.1 before 5.1.0.15 and IBM Security Identity Manager (ISIM) 6.0 before 6.0.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RES Console in Rule Execution Server in IBM Operational Decision Manager 7.5 before FP3 IF37, 8.0 before MP1 FP2, and 8.5 before MP1 IF26 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that insert XSS sequences. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Huawei HiLink E3236 before E3276sTCPU-V200R002B470D13SP00C00 and E3276sWebUI-V100R007B100D03SP01C03 and E3276 before E3236sTCPU-V200R002B146D41SP00C00 and E3236sWebUI-V100R007B100D03SP01C03 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change configuration settings or (2) use device functions. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Information Server Metadata Workbench 8.1 through 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Profiles component in IBM Connections through 3.0.1.1 CR3 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that trigger follow actions. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the admin area in X3 CMS 0.5.1 and 0.5.1.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in dotProject before 2.1.7 allow remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) search_string or (2) where parameter in a contacts action, (3) dept_id parameter in a departments action, (4) project_id[] parameter in a project action, or (5) company_id parameter in a system action to index.php. NOTE: this can be leveraged using CSRF to allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Bulb Security Smartphone Pentest Framework (SPF) 0.1.2 through 0.1.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct (1) shell metacharacter or (2) SQL injection attacks or (3) send an SMS message. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ZPanel 10.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create new FTP users via a CreateFTP action in the ftp_management module to the default URI, (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the inFullname parameter in an UpdateAccountSettings action in the my_account module to zpanel/, or (3) conduct SQL injection attacks via the inEmailAddress parameter in an UpdateClient action in the manage_clients module to the default URI. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the (1) Data Stewardship, (2) Business Admin, and (3) Product interfaces in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management (MDM) Server 8.5 before 8.5.0.82, 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.38, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.35, 10.0 before 10.0.0.0.26, and 10.1 before 10.1.0.0.15 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Executer in RICOS in IBM Algo Credit Limits (aka ACLM) 4.5.0 through 4.7.0 before 4.7.0.03 FP5 in IBM Algorithmics allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change (1) a deal's currency or (2) a limit via a crafted XML document. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ImageCMS before 4.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct SQL injection attacks via the q parameter, related to CVE-2012-6290. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in management scripts in Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager (SEPM) 12.1 before RU6 MP5 allow remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb before 5.5.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the password via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Unified Serviceability subsystem in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (Unified CCX) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCum95502. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Call Detail Records Analysis and Reporting (CAR) interface in the OS Administration component in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 10.0(1) and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that make administrative changes, aka Bug ID CSCun00701. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roundcube Webmail before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that download attachments and cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CA Release Automation (formerly iTKO LISA Release Automation) before 4.7.1 b448 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |