Export limit exceeded: 19943 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 370925 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (370925 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-6790 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2026-07-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Eclipse Jetty, for HTTP/1, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 requests, there is no strict check that the request authority (host and port) matches what provided in the Host header (if present). This was not enforced in earlier HTTP RFC (for example, in RFC 2616), but it is in the latest RFC (9110 and 9112). This mismatch can cause a number of problems that may be classified as vulnerabilities such as: * URI constructions (for example, for redirects -- this is typical for login pages) * Virtual host selection * Reverse proxying * Misleading logs * Etc. Given that the latest RFCs require that request authority and Host header must match, Jetty should enforce this invariant. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40945 | 2026-07-26 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.4.5 (All versions < V10.4.5.0.2), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), Designcenter NX (All versions < V2512.7000), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2512.7000), Simcenter Femap V2506 (All versions < V2506.0003), Simcenter Femap V2512 (All versions < V2512.0002), Simcenter Nastran (All versions < V2606), Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions < V2606), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 13), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 04), Teamcenter Visualization V2412 (All versions < V2412.0012), Teamcenter Visualization V2506 (All versions < V2506.0009), Teamcenter Visualization V2512 (All versions < V2512.2605), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2404 (All versions < V2404.0022), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2504 (All versions < V2504.0010), Tecnomatix Process Simulate (All versions < V2606). Untrusted search path in IAM Client SDK may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62422 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-07-26 | 10 Critical |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.1.13757, 2025.3.148033, 2025.2.148048, 2025.1.148120, 2024.3.148430, 2024.2.148429 authentication bypass via direct database access leading to administrative access was possible | ||||
| CVE-2026-59835 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-07-26 | 7.7 High |
| A exposure of resource to wrong sphere vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.3 through 4.4.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to access the VNC server of VMs performing scanning via network requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59841 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisiemwindowsagent | 2026-07-26 | 6.9 Medium |
| A improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEMWindowsAgent 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-59836 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2026-07-26 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.1, FortiClientEMS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-23573 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-07-26 | 6.1 Medium |
| An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.8.0, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 may allow an authenticated remote user to execute code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62642 | 1 Roundcube | 1 Webmail | 2026-07-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, an infinite loop was discovered in the TNEF decoder, which may lead to denial of service upon opening an email with a TNEF attachment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54433 | 1 Roundcube | 1 Webmail | 2026-07-26 | 7.2 High |
| In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, there is Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via a crafted plain-text email message. The attacker-controlled JavaScript executes within the victim's authenticated session simply by opening or previewing the message (zero-click). | ||||
| CVE-2026-54432 | 1 Roundcube | 1 Webmail | 2026-07-26 | 4.7 Medium |
| Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2 allows Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The issue occurs because the attachment MIME type is not properly escaped on the attachment-validation warning page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15409 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-07-26 | 10 Critical |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15410 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-07-26 | 7.2 High |
| Post-authentication improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24226 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Tensorrt-llm | 2026-07-26 | 6.3 Medium |
| NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause improper control of code generation. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, and information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15766 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uninitialized Use in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-15769 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-26 | 8.3 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Linux Toolkit Theming in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-15770 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uninitialized Use in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-15772 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-26 | 8.3 High |
| Use after free in GPU in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-15773 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-26 | 9.6 Critical |
| Use after free in Core in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 150.0.7871.125 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-24272 | 1 Nvidia | 1 Tensorrt | 2026-07-26 | 7.8 High |
| NVIDIA TensorRT contains a vulnerability where an attacker might cause an overflow to a heap-based buffer. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13585 | 1 Asus | 3 Business Manager, System Control Interface, System Control Interface V3 | 2026-07-26 | N/A |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits and Throttling and Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse in the ASUS System Control Interface driver and ASUS Business Manager allow a local administrator to disclose sensitive information via crafted IOCTL requests, which, in severe cases, may lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) on the system. Refer to the ' Security Update for ASUS System Control Interface ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. | ||||