Export limit exceeded: 10455 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10455 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23736 | 3 Bitbucket, Confluence, Jira | 3 Snotify, Snotify, Snotify | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence allows attackers to manipulate a user's S/MIME certificate of PGP key via malicious link or email. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13560 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Subscriptions & Memberships for PayPal plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5988 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59845 | 1 Apollographql | 2 Apollo Explorer, Apollo Sandbox | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23592 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability was reported in Lenovo devices with Synaptics fingerprint readers that could allow an attacker with physical access to replay fingerprints and bypass Windows Hello authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8065 | 1 Danswer-ai | 1 Danswer | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in version v1.4.1 of danswer-ai/danswer allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions in the context of the victim's browser. This includes connecting the victim's application with a malicious Slack Bot, inviting users, and deleting chats, among other actions. The application does not implement any CSRF protection, making it susceptible to these attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59901 | 1 Flexense | 2 Disk Pulse Enterprise, Sync Breeze Enterprise Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7608 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| An authenticated user can access the restricted files from NX, EX, FX, AX, IVX and CMS using path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6841 | 1 Vanna-ai | 1 Vanna | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest commit (56b782bcefd2e59b19cd7ba7878b95f54884f502) of the vanna-ai/vanna repository. Two endpoints in the built-in web app that provide SQL functionality are implemented as simple GET requests, making them susceptible to CSRF attacks. This vulnerability allows an attacker to run arbitrary SQL commands via CSRF without the target intending to expose the web app to the network or other users. The impact is limited to data alteration or deletion, as the attacker cannot read the results of the query. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22675 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Taylor Hawkes WP Fast Cache allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Fast Cache: from n/a through 1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55500 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5786 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Comtrend router WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820, affecting the GRG-4280us version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application to which he is authenticated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5676 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| The Paradox IP150 Internet Module in version 1.40.00 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks due to a lack of countermeasures and the use of the HTTP method `GET` to introduce changes in the system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56903 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Geovision GV-ASWeb with the version 6.1.1.0 or less allows attackers to modify POST request method with the GET against critical functionalities, such as account management. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56901 for a successful CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12541 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Chative Live chat and Chatbot plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the add_chative_widget_action() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the channel ID or organization ID via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This could lead to redirecting the live chat widget to an attacker-controlled channel. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25238 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| V-SOL GPON/EPON OLT Platform 2.03 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to create admin users, enable SSH, or modify system settings by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a specially crafted page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48099 | 2 Codeamp, Wordpress | 2 Search & Filter, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61430 | 1 Simpledns | 1 Simple Dns Plus | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper handling of DNS over TCP in Simple DNS Plus v9 allows a remote attacker with querying access to the DNS server to cause the server to return request payloads from other clients. This happens when the TCP length prefix is malformed (len differs from actual packet len), and due to a concurrency/buffering issue, even when the lengths match. A length prefix that is smaller than the actual packet size increases information leakage. In summary, this vulnerability allows an attacker to see DNS queries of other clients. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13432 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Webcamconsult plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25042 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the AOS-CX REST interface could allow an authenticated remote attacker with low privileges to view sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read encrypted credentials of other users on the switch, potentially leading to further unauthorized access or data breaches. | ||||