Export limit exceeded: 368544 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (368544 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16072 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-07-21 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the organization management component of Keycloak. A delegated administrator with permission to manage organizations can create an invitation for a non-existent email address and then retrieve the secret registration link directly through the application programming interface. By using this link, the administrator can create new user accounts and add them to the organization without having the required user management permissions or access to the invited email account. This allows an administrator to bypass security boundaries and add unauthorized members to an organization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13448 | 1 Ibm | 1 Langflow Oss | 2026-07-21 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the validate_public_flow_no_code_execution() function that fails to block several code-execution agent components including OpenDsStarAgent, CodeActAgentSmolagents, and CSVAgent. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16451 | 1 Zsadmin2025 | 1 Zs-admin | 2026-07-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in zsadmin2025 ZS-Admin up to b52e14536d59fda11e56e2536a1c32e82a38cead. This impacts an unknown function of the file /api/system/file/upload of the component com.zs.file.controller.SysFileController. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in unrestricted upload. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13917 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13918 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Chrome for iOS in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13919 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13926 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13928 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 8.8 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Enterprise in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13934 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 9.6 Critical |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13936 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13938 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in Fonts in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13939 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 3.1 Low |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebShare in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13941 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in SiteSettings in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13942 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 3.3 Low |
| Inappropriate implementation in Video Capture in Google Chrome on ChromeOS prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a local attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13948 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 3.1 Low |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13949 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Payments in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-65048 | 2026-07-21 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Ninja Forms plugin for WordPress versions 3.10.4 through 3.14.9 contains an unauthenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Repeatable Fieldset feature where parseSubmissionIndex() accepts arbitrary strings as submission indexes without numeric validation, and admin_form_element() interpolates the index directly into HTML without escaping. An unauthenticated attacker can submit a public form with a crafted repeater child key containing malicious script payloads, which execute in an administrator's browser when viewing submissions in the WordPress admin panel, enabling session-cookie theft, creation of administrator accounts, installation of malicious plugins, and arbitrary modification of site content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15342 | 2026-07-21 | N/A | ||
| Plane contains a multi‑tenant authorization flaw in its asset‑management API that allows authenticated users from one workspace to access, delete, or duplicate assets belonging to another workspace by providing only the victim workspace slug and asset ID. The affected endpoints return presigned file URLs and enable destructive or duplicative actions without verifying that the requester is a member of the targeted workspace. This enables cross‑tenant data exposure, data deletion, and persistent exfiltration of files into an attacker‑controlled workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47407 | 2026-07-21 | N/A | ||
| PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `dependency_id`) by primary key alone. The resource's own `workspace_id` is never compared to the URL's `workspace_id`. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace's resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `update_workspace`, `delete_workspace`). Each one inherits the default `min_role="member"` from `require_workspace_member`. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at `/api/v1/auth/register` with no email verification. The default server bind is `0.0.0.0:8000` (`python -m praisonai_platform`). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15432 | 2026-07-21 | N/A | ||
| When verifying a mac with a ChunkedMacVerification object, Tink compares the resulting tag with non constant time comparison. This potentially allows an attacker to use timinig information as a side channel in order to get information how many bytes of a given tag match the correct tag. This in turn could allow to find a correct tag bytewise. | ||||