Export limit exceeded: 370019 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (370019 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63761 | 1 Surrealdb | 1 Surrealdb | 2026-07-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| SurrealDB before 3.1.0 silently substitutes the ES384 algorithm when a JWT access method is configured with ALGORITHM ES512 (DEFINE ACCESS ... TYPE JWT ALGORITHM ES512), because the underlying jsonwebtoken crate (v10.x) has no ES512 variant and the mapping defaults to ES384 without any error, warning, or log message. Users who supply the correct P-521 key for ES512 experience authentication handshake failures due to the curve mismatch with ES384 (which expects P-384), and tokens are rejected by external systems expecting genuine ES512 signatures. The flaw cannot be used to forge tokens or compromise data confidentiality or integrity, as ES384 remains cryptographically strong. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63762 | 1 Surrealdb | 1 Surrealdb | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| SurrealDB before v2.6.1 (and before v3.0.0-beta.3) contains a denial of service vulnerability in its embedded JavaScript scripting engine, which is enabled via the --allow-scripting capability (disabled by default). Any user able to execute arbitrary queries — including unauthenticated guests when --allow-guests is enabled — can use built-in string functions to construct a large string and pass it to the JavaScript runtime for compilation, triggering a null pointer dereference in the underlying QuickJS-NG engine. This causes the server process to terminate immediately without graceful shutdown, requiring a manual restart. The issue was fixed by updating the rquickjs dependency from v0.9.0 to v0.11.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63763 | 1 Surrealdb | 1 Surrealdb | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| SurrealDB before 2.5.0 and before 3.0.0-beta.3 contains a confused deputy privilege escalation vulnerability. Unprivileged users (e.g., those with the database editor role) can create or modify fields containing futures, functions, or closures. Because these are executed in the context of the invoking/querying user rather than their creator, an attacker can plant malicious logic that executes with a higher-privileged user's permissions when that user reads or writes the affected record. This can lead to full privilege escalation, including creation of a root owner and server takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57309 | 1 Jcd | 1 Windu Cms | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| A Blind SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in Windu CMS. A remote unauthenticated attacker is able to inject SQL syntax into URL path in HTTP header resulting in Blind SQL Injection. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 4.1 but may also affect other versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57310 | 1 Jcd | 1 Windu Cms | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| Windu CMS uses hashing algorithm based on MD5 and SHA1 with static salt to store user passwords. This allows an attacker who obtain password hash to decode user credentials. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 4.1 but may also affect other versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57311 | 1 Jcd | 1 Windu Cms | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| Windu CMS does not validate types of uploaded files. An authenticated attacker can upload arbitrary files, including PHP. This can lead to Remote Code Execution. Because vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 4.1 but may also affect other versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46516 | 1 Mwtcmi | 1 Frogman | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| Frogman provides headless FreePBX control. Prior to version 1.6.6, Frogman's chat-console markdown formatter (`assets/js/chat.js`'s `formatMarkdown`) inserted regex capture groups as raw HTML in four template patterns: inline code, bold, markdown links, and download links. Tool responses that reflect user-controlled fields — extension names, ring-group descriptions, IVR names, queue descriptions, etc. — could carry an HTML/JavaScript payload that executes when another admin views the response through Frogman chat. The payload runs in the viewer's session, with the viewer's permissions. FreePBX's own admin GUI escapes these same fields via `freepbx_htmlspecialchars()` throughout its view templates. The chat formatter was the leaky side. Version 1.6.6 patches the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13724 | 1 Gobito Informatics Technologies | 1 Corporate Training Management System | 2026-07-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security vulnerability in Gobito Informatics Technologies Engineering Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Corporate Training Management System allows Input Data Manipulation. This issue affects Corporate Training Management System: before dd1a9df64. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21824 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Commerce | 2026-07-23 | 8.8 High |
| HCL Commerce contains an privilege escalation vulnerability that could allow denial of service, disclosure of user personal data, and performing of unauthorized administrative operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46415 | 1 Jasonlovesdoggo | 1 Caddy-defender | 2026-07-23 | 8.2 High |
| The Caddy Defender plugin is a middleware for Caddy that allows users to block or manipulate requests based on the client's IP address. Prior to version 0.10.1, Caddy Defender used `r.RemoteAddr` when evaluating whether a request should be blocked. `RemoteAddr` is the address of the immediate peer connected to Caddy. In deployments where Caddy is behind a trusted proxy, CDN, or load balancer, the immediate peer is usually the proxy, not the original client. Caddy resolves the original client address into its `client_ip` request variable after applying the configured `trusted_proxies` policy, but Defender did not use that value. As a result, clients from blocked IP ranges could bypass Defender when accessing Caddy through a trusted proxy whose own IP address was not blocked. This affects deployments that use Defender behind trusted proxies and expect it to enforce blocking based on the real client IP. The issue is fixed in version 0.10.1 by making Defender prefer Caddys resolved `client_ip` request variable when it is available. Defender falls back to `RemoteAddr` only when Caddy has not provided a resolved client IP. There is no complete workaround in affected Defender versions for deployments that rely on Caddy's trusted proxy client IP resolution. Until upgrading, affected users should enforce equivalent IP blocking at the trusted proxy, CDN, load balancer, firewall, or other edge layer before traffic reaches Caddy. Deployments where Caddy receives traffic directly from clients, without an intermediate trusted proxy, are not affected by this bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6793 | 1 Bifra Engineering Consulting | 1 Q-smart Next Poll | 2026-07-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Bifra Engineering Consulting Ltd. Q-smart NexT Poll allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Q-smart NexT Poll: before 1.8.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63102 | 1 Rconfig | 1 Rconfig V8 Core | 2026-07-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| rConfig Core before 8.2.8 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows authenticated users to assign arbitrary roles to any account by submitting an unvalidated role field through the Users API during user creation or profile updates. Attackers can exploit the missing allowlist validation and absent admin-level authorization check in StoreUserRequest to mass-assign the Admin role directly to the User model, granting access to privileged features. rConfig Pro and Enterprise are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32807 | 1 Datacycle-engine | 1 Datacycle-core | 2026-07-23 | 7.5 High |
| dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, anyone with a DataLink UUID can fetch the attached text file directly, even if the link is expired, the caller is unauthenticated, or the normal show flow would have denied access. Because the route is public and the mailer embeds the direct file URL, any leaked, forwarded, logged, or stale email link can continue to expose the attachment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32822 | 1 Datacycle-engine | 1 Datacycle-core | 2026-07-23 | 6.1 Medium |
| dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, any unauthenticated attacker can place arbitrary HTML into flash notifications on public routes and rely on the frontend toast component to inject that content into the DOM with `innerHTML`. This creates a reflected DOM XSS that can be delivered with a crafted link to a public page such as `/docs`. Because the vulnerable JavaScript is loaded by the normal application layout, the issue is not limited to a special debug page or an isolated admin-only view. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45797 | 1 Heyform | 1 Heyform | 2026-07-23 | N/A |
| HeyForm is an open-source form builder. Prior to version 3.0.0-rc.7, the `/api/upload` endpoint allows unauthenticated file uploads including SVG files. Uploaded SVGs are stored in the static assets directory and served with `Content-Type: image/svg+xml` by Express's serve-static middleware, allowing an attacker to achieve stored cross-site scripting (XSS) on the heyform domain without any authentication. Version 3.0.0-rc.7 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35198 | 1 Heyform | 1 Heyform | 2026-07-23 | 9 Critical |
| HeyForm is an open-source form builder. Prior to version 3.0.0-rc.7, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the form builder allows a low-privileged team member to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when a team owner views the form, leading to complete account takeover through privilege escalation. Version 3.0.0-rc.7 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63428 | 1 Heyform | 1 Heyform | 2026-07-23 | 5.8 Medium |
| HeyForm is an open-source form builder. Prior to version 3.0.0-rc.9, `completeSubmission` accepts a `hiddenFields: [{id, name, value}]` array from the submitter and stores it verbatim in `submission.hiddenFields`, without validating the supplied `id`/`name` against the form's declared `form.hiddenFields` schema. An anonymous form submitter can therefore inject arbitrary key/value pairs (including XSS payloads, fake authorization metadata, integration-relevant values) into the stored submission. These fields are subsequently forwarded as-is to every webhook integration registered on the form. Version 3.0.0-rc.9 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63429 | 1 Heyform | 1 Heyform | 2026-07-23 | 8.6 High |
| HeyForm is an open-source form builder. Prior to version 3.0.0-rc.9, `POST /api/upload` has no authentication guard, no global guard, no form-context validation, no `openToken` requirement, and no session cookie check. Any anonymous internet user can upload files (PDF, DOC/DOCX, XLS/XLSX, CSV, TXT, MP4, images, etc., up to 10 MB) and receive a permanent public URL on the HeyForm domain. The endpoint is used by both authenticated form creators and unauthenticated form submitters; because no form-context binding exists, every request to it is anonymously accepted. Version 3.0.0-rc.9 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46671 | 1 Msiemens | 1 Onenote.rs | 2026-07-23 | 4.4 Medium |
| Rust OneNote File Parser is a parser for Microsoft OneNote files implemented in Rust. Prior to version 1.1.1, a maliciously crafted `.onetoc2` table-of-contents file can cause `Parser::parse_notebook` to open arbitrary files on the host filesystem outside the notebook's directory. The parser reads entry names listed inside the `.onetoc2` and joins them against the notebook's base directory without validating that they are relative paths confined to that directory. The parser will bail out when the target file fails to parse as a OneNote section, so direct content exfiltration through the parser's return value is not practical, though file-existence probing and denial-of-service via large or special files remain possible. Anyone using `onenote_parser` to parse .onetoc2 files received from untrusted sources is affected. Users who only ever parse their own notebooks are not at meaningful risk. The issue is fixed in onenote_parser 1.1.1. The fix rejects absolute paths, parent-directory components, and other invalid path characters in entry names, and additionally canonicalises the resolved path to confirm it stays inside the notebook's base directory. For users who cannot upgrade to 1.1.1, only call `Parser::parse_notebook` on `.onetoc2` files from trusted sources. Alternatively, use `Parser::parse_section` / `Parser::parse_section_buffer` on individual .one files, which do not perform the directory walk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32819 | 1 Datacycle-engine | 1 Datacycle-core | 2026-07-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| dataCycle is a data management system for centrally storing, managing, searching, finding, and distributing data. In dataCycle-CORE, the module handling core processing and framework rules, before and including version 25.07.3, a Standard user can enumerate other users' names and email addresses through `/users/search`, even though direct access to those user profiles is denied. This leaks internal staff addresses, full names, and existence of guest and external test accounts. | ||||