Export limit exceeded: 370450 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 370450 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (370450 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-51539 | 2026-07-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the receive loop of libmodbus 3.1.12 when running on Windows. The issue stems from improper timeout management during network read operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26396 | 2026-07-24 | 7.5 High | ||
| OpenBMB XAgent v1.0.0 and before is vulnerable to path traversal in the file() function in XAgent/XAgentServer/application/routers/workspace.py. The input parameter “filename” is user-controllable and is concatenated into the file path to be read without proper validation, leading to a directory traversal vulnerability that may result in sensitive information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12582 | 2 Library Management System Project, Wordpress | 2 Library Management System, Wordpress | 2026-07-24 | 8.6 High |
| The Library Management System WordPress plugin before 3.5.8 does not sanitize and escape a user-supplied parameter before using it in a SQL statement, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection and extract arbitrary data from the database, including user password hashes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57898 | 2026-07-24 | 9 Critical | ||
| In Eclipse BaSyx Java Server SDK versions 2.0.0-milestone-05 to 2.0.0-milestone-12, deployments using the MongoDB backend are vulnerable to an unauthenticated arbitrary file write through the AAS thumbnail API. The AAS thumbnail upload path accepted a client-controlled fileName request parameter and passed it through repository file handling as both a repository key and, during thumbnail retrieval, a local filesystem path. With the MongoDB file repository, the supplied filename was treated as an opaque GridFS key and was not normalized or restricted as a filesystem path. A remote attacker could upload thumbnail content using an absolute or traversal-style filename, then trigger thumbnail retrieval so that the uploaded bytes were written to the attacker-chosen path on the server filesystem. This could allow writing files anywhere the Java process has permission to write and may lead to remote code execution. The default InMemory backend is not affected by this specific path because it normalizes and restricts file paths to its temporary directory. The issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Java Server SDK 2.0.0-milestone-13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12606 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2026-07-24 | N/A |
| Eclipse Grizzly in versions before 5.0.2, cannot properly parse the trailer section in malformed trailer header's line, which can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6790 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2026-07-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Eclipse Jetty, for HTTP/1, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 requests, there is no strict check that the request authority (host and port) matches what provided in the Host header (if present). This was not enforced in earlier HTTP RFC (for example, in RFC 2616), but it is in the latest RFC (9110 and 9112). This mismatch can cause a number of problems that may be classified as vulnerabilities such as: * URI constructions (for example, for redirects -- this is typical for login pages) * Virtual host selection * Reverse proxying * Misleading logs * Etc. Given that the latest RFCs require that request authority and Host header must match, Jetty should enforce this invariant. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56451 | 2026-07-24 | 10 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in Opcenter X (All versions < V2604). Affected applications do not properly validate the algorithm specified in the JSON Web Token (JWT) header. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to forge arbitrary JWT, bypass authentication mechanisms and impersonate any user including administrative accounts, potentially gaining full unauthorized access to the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12588 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | ||
| An attacker with access to an HX 10.0.0 and previous versions, may send specially-crafted data to the HX console. The malicious detection would then trigger decompression of a large file that consumes an excessive amount of system resources thus causing a Denial of Service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65762 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - phoca.cz - Reflected XSS vulnerability in Phoca Guestbook 5.0.0-6.1.0 - Improper validation of user inputs lead to a reflective XSS vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65763 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - phoca.cz - Reflected XSS vulnerability in Phoca Maps 5.0.0-6.0.4 - Improper validation of user inputs lead to a reflective XSS vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14903 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Xtraction | 2026-07-24 | 7.7 High |
| Path traversal in Ivanti Xtraction before version 2026.2.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files outside the web root. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59836 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2026-07-24 | 6.7 Medium |
| A improper certificate validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiClientEMS 7.4.0 through 7.4.1, FortiClientEMS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2025-43892 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-07-24 | 4.1 Medium |
| A buffer over-read vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions may allow an authenticated remote attacker to return a portion of device memory in the redirect response via submitting a specially crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59840 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-07-24 | 4.1 Medium |
| A buffer over-read vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.13, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-54433 | 1 Roundcube | 1 Webmail | 2026-07-24 | 7.2 High |
| In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, there is Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via a crafted plain-text email message. The attacker-controlled JavaScript executes within the victim's authenticated session simply by opening or previewing the message (zero-click). | ||||
| CVE-2026-56687 | 2026-07-24 | 7.8 High | ||
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2100, contain an Obsolete Feature in UI vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2021-27137 | 1 Dd-wrt | 1 Dd-wrt | 2026-07-24 | 8.1 High |
| An issue was discovered in router/upnp/src/ssdp.c in DD-WRT before 45724. An unsafe strcpy in the UPnP handling functionality allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send a request that would overflow an internal fixed buffer. Exploitation requires the DD-WRT user to enable UPnP (which is off by default, and only listens on internal interfaces by default). This occurs in ssdp_msearch (reachable by an M-SEARCH request). | ||||
| CVE-2026-14371 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Xclarity Integrator For Microsoft Windows Admin Center | 2026-07-24 | N/A |
| The Lenovo XClarity Integrator for Windows Admin Center plugin version 5.1.1 and below running on the WAC Gateway is vulnerable to Powershell Command Injection when establishing remote PowerShell commands. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60357 | 2026-07-24 | 8.1 High | ||
| AhnLab EPP Management v1.0.14.32-6249 was discovered to contain a NoSQL injection vulnerability via the eventlog/agentEvent/list endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23565 | 1 Hclsoftware | 1 Aftermarket Epc | 2026-07-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to email flooding as the application does not have a proper mail limitation mechanism at Forget Password functionality. The actor could b e a human or an automated process such as a virus or bot. This could be used to cause a denial of service, compromise program logic or other consequences. | ||||